bf free wallpaper: 3d Wallpapers

Sunday, 20 May 2012

3d Wallpapers

3d Wallpapers Biography

I KNOW that 3D television technology is not going to be "The Next Big Thing" like many people thought. There's a good chance that it may even end up as a major financial failure. But I'd still like to have a TV with 3D capability since several upcoming big event programs, like the 2012 London Summer Olympic Games, will be broadcast in 3D; and, besides, even if 3D broadcasts go away, these TVs are still very good for regular old high-definition reception. Is the picture quality of glasses-free 3D TVs superior enough to make it worth waiting for the glasses-free 3D TVs to become available in the United States, or should I go ahead and purchase the kind that require glasses? I understand that, when glasses-free 3D TVs Do become available in the United States, they'll retail for $10,000.00, and that's an awful lot of money to spend for a TV, especially since 3D broadcasts are likely to be commercial failures and to go away soon. Also, even though not having to wear the 3D glasses is certainly more convenient, wearing the 3D glasses is not THAT much of an inconvenience. I know that these Yahoo Answers questions go out to countries all around the world, including Japan, where these glasses-free TVs are already on the market. And I know that even people in the United States have seen these glasses-free TVs in the form of demos at exhibitions. So, are they better than the kind that require glasses, or not?

3d Wallpapers